It’s no secret that horse racing betting is a popular pastime for many people around the world. However, what is…
If you are someone who is well above 50 and is probably settling into the 60s or the 70s, you…
In one of the most remote places in the world, in Svalbard (near the Arctic Ocean), Bill Gates invests millions…
It’s no secret that horse racing betting is a popular pastime for many people around the world. However, what is…
It’s no secret that horse racing betting is a popular pastime for many people around the world. However, what…
In one of the most remote places in the world, in Svalbard (near the Arctic Ocean), Bill Gates invests…
Jenifer is not the first personality to fall into the trap and unfortunately it will probably not be the…
Are non-compliance and free-thinking a mental illness? According to the latest edition of DSM-IV (Diagnostic and statistical manual of…
It’s no secret that horse racing betting is a popular pastime for many people around the world. However, what is less well known is that there are many different ways to bet on races, and not all of them are created equal. In this article, we’ll take a look at some of the most important factors in horse racing you should consider before placing a horse racing bet online. We’ll also provide some tips on how to get the most out of your betting experience. So read on, and learn how to make the most informed bets possible.
Understand the basics of horse racing betting
Horse racing betting might seem difficult to understand at first, but it’s not as complicated as it seems. Once you know the basics, you’ll be ready to make some smart bets and hopefully win some money.
Horse racing is one of the oldest sports in the world. Its popularity lies in its simplicity and the fact that almost anyone can bet on a race and have a chance to make some money. Although it may seem daunting to new bettors, understanding the basics of horse racing betting is quite simple. According to Vents Magazine, what you need to understand before placing a bet online is that there are three most common types of bets – win, place, and show. You also need to understand how to read the odds board and make some basic wagers.
Choose a reputable online bookmaker
Itching to bet on a horse race but can’t make it to the track? Or maybe you’re an experienced racing fan who wants the convenience of online betting. Either way, you need to know how to find a safe and reputable online bookmaker. Not all bookmakers are created equal, so it’s important to do your research before signing up. Some have more comprehensive information and features than others, making it easier to make informed decisions about your bets.
Research the horses and jockeys involved
Betting on horses is a popular pastime for many people. While some may bet casually, others take their horse betting more seriously and research the horses and jockeys involved before placing a bet. If you’re looking to place some horse bets, it’s important to do your research on the horses and jockeys involved. Not all horses are created equal, and not all jockeys know how to ride every horse. By familiarizing yourself with the horses and jockeys in the race, you’ll be able to make a more informed decision about who to bet on. So take some time to read up on the horses and their riders before placing any bets. You may just find that you have a winning ticket waiting for you.
Make sure you have a betting strategy in place
No matter how much you may love horse racing, if you don’t have a betting strategy in place, you’re going to lose money in the long run. First of all, you need to understand how the odds work and what they mean for you. Having a plan for how much money you’re willing to lose is also extremely important, because you don’t want to end up not having the money to even pay your bills. Knowing your limits and not betting more than you can afford to lose is the only way to make sure you’re going to have a pleasant experience. Always look for value in the bets you make, and avoid blindly picking winners. Finally, don’t get emotional about your bets and stay rational at all times because this can’t bring you anything but trouble.
Bet sensibly and within your budget
To enjoy horse racing, you don’t have to break the bank. There are ways that you can bet on horses within your budget, and this comes down to all the points made earlier in this article. First, make sure that you know the basics of horse racing betting. There are different types of bets, and each has its risks and rewards. Next, find a reputable online or local bookie to place your bets with. Compare the odds at different bookies to get the best payout. Finally, start small and build up your bankroll over time. With a little bit of patience and research, you can enjoy this exciting sport without spending too much money.
If you are someone who is well above 50 and is probably settling into the 60s or the 70s, you should actually be really careful when you are taking prescriptions and also when you are taking over-the-counter medication. It would be best if you also thought a lot before you go and take herbal pills as well. There are some supplements which older people should take because it would benefit them; you should have consulted a doctor before you go and start taking them because they could have some effects on your body which you have no idea about. That’s why the talentedladiesclub recommend that older people have a responsible person by their side to closely monitor their health and medications..
You may be thinking “why the special concern.” Well, that would be because the older you get, the more vulnerable and the more likely you are to make use of some additional medicines and that would actually increase the chances of harmful drug effects, and they include interactions with other medicines as well. That is why your doctor should know every single pill or any medication that goes into your body because they will know what kind of interactions the medicine may have with each other and how they could affect you later on. These potential complications are some things that should actually be completely avoided indeed. Your kidney or even your liver may not actually work well when the drugs have some sort of unwanted reaction in your body.
Here are some things that you should do the older you get.
- You should make sure that you consume all of the medicine properly and as prescribed. They should also be taken at the right time. You should also know whether you should take it with or without food. Some people just straight out disagree with their doctors, and they do not even consume the medications when they are supposed. They will later blame the doctor saying the doctor was incompetent. Do not be one of those people. Be honest with your doctor and make sure all of the medicine goes into your body on time.
- If you are someone who has to take multiple medicines at different times in a day, it is only logical that you keep a list ready, a list that will make sure that you take all of the right ones on time. It should also be up to date, and you should also make a copy and give it to a family member and a friend as well.
- I am sure that if you are someone who takes a lot of pills, you will know that some of them will have some side effects too. You should know how to deal with them in the best way possible.
In one of the most remote places in the world, in Svalbard (near the Arctic Ocean), Bill Gates invests millions to collect all the seeds of the world in a vault. Its partners are the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto, the Syngenta Foundation and the government of Norway. What is behind this Noah’s Ark plant project?
If there is one thing that cannot be blamed on Microsoft founder Bill Gates, it’s laziness. He was already programming at 14 and he founded Microsoft at 20, while still studying at Harvard. In 1995, Forbes recorded him as the richest man in the world, the largest shareholder of Microsoft, his company which has fiercely established a de facto monopoly in computer systems for personal computers.
In 2006, when most people in this situation would retire to a calm Pacific island, Bill Gates decided to devote his energy to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the largest private foundation “transparent” as he says, with a huge endowment of 34.6 billion dollars and the legal obligation to spend 1.5 billion dollars per year for humanitarian projects in the world, in order to maintain its charitable status exempt from tax. In 2006, the gift of about $ 30 billion in Berkshire Hathaway shares from super-investor Warren Buffett, friend and business partner, placed the Gates foundation in a category that spends almost the entire sum of the annual budget of the United Nations World Health Organization (WHO).
So when Bill Gates decides to invest in a project, through the Gates Foundation, some $ 30 million of his hard earned money, it’s worth taking a look at.
For the moment, no project is more interesting than this curious enterprise in one of the most remote places in the world, in Svalbard. Bill Gates is investing millions in a seed vault on the Barents Sea near the Arctic Ocean, some 1,100 kilometers from the North Pole. Svalbard is a sterile piece of rock claimed by Norway and sold in 1925 by an international treaty (see map).
On this lost island, Bill Gates is investing tens of millions with, among others, the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto Corporation, the Syngenta Foundation and the government of Norway, in what is called “doomsday seed bank” better this expression which combines vault, seeds and end of time or apocalypse. Officially, the project is called the Svalbard Global Seed Vault on the Norwegian island of Spitsbergen, which is part of the Svalbard Archipelago.
The seed vault is under construction inside a mountain on the island of Spitsbergen, near the small village of Longyearbyen. According to their press release, it’s almost “ready for business”. The vault will have explosion-proof double doors, with motion detectors, two airlocks and three-meter-thick reinforced concrete walls. It will contain up to three million different varieties of seeds from around the world, “so that plant diversity can be preserved for the future,” according to the Norwegian government. The seeds will be specially wrapped to protect them from humidity. There will be no full-time staff, but the relative inaccessibility of the vault will facilitate monitoring of any human activity.
Did we miss something? Their press release stated, “so that plant diversity can be preserved for the future”. What future, foreseen by the sponsors of the Noah plant ark, would threaten the current availability of seeds, almost all of them already being sheltered in vaults around the world?
Whenever Bill Gates, the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto and Syngenta meet on a joint project, it is worth digging a little deeper under the rocks of Spitsbergen, because there are fascinating things to be found there.
The first remarkable point is the identity of the sponsors of Noah’s ark. Those who unite with the Norwegians are, as we have said, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; the US food giant DuPont / Pioneer Hi-Bred, one of the largest patent owners of GMOs (genetically modified organisms), plant seeds and other agrochemicals; Syngenta, through its foundation, the main Swiss company of GM seeds and agrochemicals; the Rockefeller Foundation, the private group that created the genetic revolution, with more than $ 100 million in seeds since the 1970s; CGIAR, the global network created by the Rockefeller Foundation to promote its ideal of genetic purity through the conversion of agriculture.
Something you may not know * – He apparently used to love spending some of his spare time on online casino sites.
THE CGIAR AND “THE PROJECT”
As I explained in detail in the book Seeds of Destruction (1), in 1960, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Council on Agricultural Development of John D. Rockefeller III and the Foundation Ford, have joined forces to create the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in Los Baños, the Philippines. In 1971, the IRRI of the Rockefeller Foundation, with its International Center for the Improvement of Corn and Wheat in Mexico and two other international research centers created by the Rockefeller and Ford foundations, partnered with IITA for the tropical agriculture, in Nigeria, to form the International Consultative Group on Agricultural Research (CGIAR).
The CGIAR was formed during a series of private conferences organized at the congress center of the Rockefeller Foundation, in Bellagio, Italy. The main participants in Bellagio were George Harrar of the Rockefeller Foundation, Forrest Hill of the Ford Foundation, Robert McNamara of the World Bank, and Maurice Strong, the international environmental organizer of the Rockefeller family, who, as an agent of the Foundation Rockefeller, had organized the UN Earth Summit in Stockholm in 1972. For many decades, the Foundation had diverted science to put it at the service of eugenics, a hideous version of theories on the purity of the race , as part of what she simply called “The Project”.
To ensure maximum impact, the CGIAR involved the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) and the World Bank. Thus, in the early 1970s, thanks to the carefully planned influence of its initial resources, the Rockefeller Foundation was able to shape world agricultural policy. And she did not hesitate.
Funded by generous scholarships from the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, the CGIAR ensured that leading agricultural scientists and Third World agronomists were brought to the US to “master” the production concepts of the modern food industry, so that they bring them back to their homeland. In the operation, they created a network of influence extremely useful for the promotion of the US food industry in these countries, and more particularly for the promotion of the “genetic revolution” of GMOs in developing countries. And all this in the name of science and the profitability of the free agricultural market.
A GENETICALLY MODIFIED TOP BREED?
The Svalbard seed vault is now starting to get interesting. But it gets even better. “The Project” that I mentioned is, since the 1920s, the project of the Rockefeller Foundation and powerful financial interests to use eugenics, renamed today genetic, to justify the creation of a genetically superior race changed. Hitler and the Nazis called it the Aryan superior race.
Hitler’s eugenics was largely funded by the same Rockefeller Foundation, which is now building a Noah’s ark to preserve samples of all the seeds on our planet. There, it becomes really intriguing. In its relentless quest to reduce human life to a “defined gene sequence”, the Rockefeller Foundation created the pseudo-scientific discipline of molecular biology, which could then allow it to modify human characteristics at will. Hitler’s Eugenics – many of whom were quietly brought back to the United States after the war to continue their biological research on eugenics – laid many foundations for the genetic manipulation of various life forms and were openly supported, right up to the Third Reich, through generous grants from the Rockefeller Foundation. (2)
This same Rockefeller Foundation created the famous Green Revolution during a trip to Mexico in 1946 of Nelson Rockefeller and Henry Wallace, former secretary of agriculture during the New Deal and founder of the company Pioneer Hi-Bred Seed.
The Green Revolution aimed to solve the problem of hunger on a large scale in the world, in Mexico, in India and in other selected countries where Rockefeller worked. Norman Borlaug, the agronomist at the Rockefeller Foundation, won the Nobel Peace Prize for his work, the kind of thing you don’t brag about when you know people like Henry Kissinger share the same.
In reality, as it appeared years later, the Green Revolution was a brilliant scheme by the Rockefeller family to develop a globalized food industry over which it could then exercise a monopoly, just as it had done in the petroleum industry a half a century ago. As Henry Kissinger said in the 1970s: “If you control oil you control the country; if you control food, you control the population. ”
Rockefeller’s food and green revolution went hand in hand. It was part of a larger strategy that included funding from the Rockefeller Foundation for research to develop genetic engineering in plants and animals a few years later.
John H. Davis was assistant to the Minister of Agriculture under the chairmanship of Dwight Eisenhower in the early 1950s. He left Washington in 1955 and went to Harvard Graduate School of Business, an unusual location at that time for an agricultural expert . He had a clear strategy. In 1956 Davis wrote an article in the Harvard Business Review, where he stated that “the only way to solve the famous agricultural problem once and for all by avoiding the heaviness of government programs is to advance agriculture for agroalimentary “. He knew precisely where he was coming from, even if few people suspected at the time: a real revolution in agricultural production that would concentrate control of the food chain in the hands of multinationals, far from the traditional family of farmers. (3)
A crucial aspect of driving the interests of the Rockefeller Foundation and US agrifood companies, was the fact that the Green Revolution was based on the proliferation of new hybrid seeds in developing markets. The main characteristic of hybrid seeds is their lack of reproductive capacity. The hybrids had been produced by proliferation protectionism. Unlike the open pollination of natural species, whose seed gives a yield similar to that of its parents, the seed yield of hybrid plants is significantly lower than that of the first generation.
This decline in yields specific to hybrids meant that farmers normally had to buy seeds each year to obtain high yields. In addition, the lower yield of the second generation eliminated the seed trade that producers often do without authorization from the seed producer. This prevented the redistribution of seeds from commercial crops by intermediaries. If the large multinational seed companies were able to control the seed of the parental lines upstream, no competitor or farmer would be able to produce a hybrid. The global concentration of hybrid seed patents in a handful of gigantic seed companies, led by Pioneer Hi-Bred of DuPont and Dekalb of Monsanto, set the stage for the GMO seed revolution. (4)
In reality, the introduction of modern American agricultural techniques, chemical fertilizers and commercial hybrid seeds have made all farmers in developing countries – and in particular the largest and strongest – dependent on foreign countries, especially products. basic US food and petrochemicals. It was the first step in what was to be a carefully planned process over several decades.
Thanks to the Green Revolution, the food industry has made great inroads into markets whose access was previously limited to American exporters. The trend was later dubbed “market-oriented agriculture”. It was in reality the control of agriculture by the food industry.
Through the Green Revolution, the Rockefeller Foundation and later the Ford Foundation worked hand in hand, shaping and supporting the foreign policy objectives of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the CIA .
One of the main effects of the Green Revolution was to depopulate the countryside and force the peasants to flee to the slums of the suburbs of the suburbs, desperately looking for a job. It was not a coincidence, it was part of the plan to create pools of cheap labor for the next US multinational industries, the “globalization” of recent years.
When self-promotion around the Green Revolution subsided, the results were quite different from what had been promised. Problems arose from the indiscriminate use of new chemical pesticides, often with serious health consequences. Over time, the monoculture of new varieties of hybrid seeds caused a decline in soil fertility and yield. The first results were impressive: yield doubled, even tripled, of certain crops such as wheat and, later, corn in Mexico. Yields that quickly melted.
The Green Revolution was usually accompanied by large irrigation projects, often with loans from the World Bank for the construction of huge dams and, in the process, the flooding of previously inhabited and fertile regions. Thus, the superior yield of super wheat was obtained by saturating the soil with enormous quantities of fertilizers, made up of nitrates and petroleum, raw materials controlled by the seven big sister oil companies dominated by the Rockefellers.
In addition, huge quantities of herbicides and pesticides were used, creating new markets for the giants of the petroleum and chemical industry. As one analyst put it, the Green Revolution was really just a chemical revolution. At no time could developing countries pay for the huge quantities of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. They would get free loans from the World Bank and special loans from Chase Bank and other major New York banks, backed by guarantees from the United States government.
Applied in a large number of developing countries, these loans were made to most large landowners. For small farmers, the situation was different. They could not afford chemicals and other modern needs and had to borrow money.
Initially, various government programs attempted to provide loans to farmers so that they could buy seeds and fertilizers. Those who were unable to participate in this type of program had to borrow from the private sector. Because of the exorbitant interest rate on loans, many small farmers could not even benefit from the first higher yields. After the harvest, they had to sell most if not all of their production to pay off loans and interest. Dependent on pawnbrokers and traders, many of them lost their land. Even with preferential rate loans from government agencies, more and more food crops are giving way to cash crop production. (5)
For decades, the same interests, notably those of the Rockefeller Foundation which supported the Green Revolution, have been working to promote the new “genetic revolution,” as Gordon Conway, president of the Rockefeller Foundation called it a few years ago. , that is to say the dissemination of products from industrial and commercial agriculture, in particular patented GMO seeds.
GATES, ROCKEFELLER AND THE GREEN REVOLUTION IN AFRICA
While keeping in mind the experience of the Rockefeller Foundation’s Green Revolution in the 1950s, it seems particularly curious that the Rockefeller and Gates foundations, who are now investing millions of dollars in the preservation of all seeds against a possible “apocalyptic” scenario, are also investing millions in a project called Alliance for the Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA).
AGRA, as it called itself, is an alliance with the same Rockefeller Foundation which created the “genetic revolution”. A glance at the AGRA board of directors confirms this.
Its president is none other than Kofi Annan, the former Secretary-General of the United Nations. In June 2007, in his acceptance speech at a meeting of the World Economic Forum in Cape Town, South Africa, Kofi Annan said: “I accept this challenge with gratitude for the Rockefeller Foundation, for the Bill & Melinda Gates, and for all those who support our African campaign ”.
AGRA’s board also includes a South African, Strive Masiyiwa, representative of the Rockefeller Foundation; Sylvia M. Mathews of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; Mamphela Ramphele, former managing director of the World Bank (2000-2006); Rajiv J. Shah of the Gates Foundation; Nadya K. Shmavonian of the Rockefeller Foundation; Roy Steiner of the Gates Foundation. In addition, AGRA also employs Gary Toenniessen, the executive director of the Rockefeller Foundation and Akinwumi Adesina, associate director of the Rockefeller Foundation.
To further expand the list, AGRA Programs employ Peter Matlon, Executive Director of the Rockefeller Foundation; Joseph De Vries, Director of the Africa Seed Systems Program and Associate Director of the Rockefeller Foundation; Akinwumi Adesina, associate director of the Rockefeller Foundation. Like the old Green Revolution that failed in India and Mexico, the new Green Revolution in Africa is clearly a priority of the Rockefeller Foundation.
Although still keeping a low profile to this day, Monsanto and the main giants of the GM food industry are suspected of being at the heart of the problem by using Kofi Annan’s AGRA to disseminate their patented GM seeds throughout the country. Africa under the misleading label of “biotechnology,” the new euphemism for patented genetically modified seeds. To date, South Africa is the only African country that legally authorizes the planting of GM crops. In 2003 Burkina Faso authorized GMO trials. In 2005, Kofi Annan’s Ghana drafted biosafety laws and key officials have expressed their intention to continue research into GM crops.
Africa is the next target of the US government’s campaign for global dissemination of GMOs. Its rich soils make it an ideal candidate. Obviously, many African governments suspect the worst from the sponsors of GMOs, because a multitude of genetic engineering and biosafety projects have been started in Africa, with the aim of introducing GMOs into its farming systems. These include sponsorships offered by the US government to train African genetic engineers in the United States, biosafety projects funded by USAID and the World Bank; research on GMOs involving indigenous African food crops.
The Rockefeller Foundation has worked for years, largely without success, to promote projects to introduce GMOs into fields in Africa. It has funded research that supports the applicability of GMO cotton in the Makhathini Flats, South Africa.
Monsanto, which has established a strong bridgehead in the GMO and hybrid seed industry in South Africa, has designed an ingenious program for smallholders, “Seeds and Hope,” which introduces a small-scale green revolution package among poor farmers, followed, of course, by Monsanto’s patented GMO seeds. (6)
The Swiss company Syngenta AG, one of the “Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse GMO”, is investing millions of dollars in a cultivation center in Nairobi to develop GMO corn resistant to insects. Syngenta is also part of the CGIAR. (7)
CONTINUE AT SVALBARD
So is it simply an excess of philosophical sentimentality? What drives the Gates and Rockefeller foundations to finance the proliferation of patented seeds, soon to be Terminator, across Africa? This process destroyed the diversity of plant seeds wherever industrialized agro-food monoculture was introduced. At the same time, they are investing tens of millions of dollars to preserve all known seed varieties in an Apocalypse-proof vault near the Arctic Circle, “so that plant diversity can be preserved for the future, ”to resume their official press release.
It is not fortuitous that the Rockefeller and Gates foundations team up to advocate a GMO revolution of Green Revolution style in Africa, while quietly funding the “Noah’s ark” in Svalbard. The giants of the GM food industry are involved in the Svalbard project to the neck.
Truth be told, the entire Svalbard business, as well as the people involved, conjure up images of disaster worse than those of Michael Crichton’s bestseller, The Andromeda Variety. In this sci-fi thriller, a deadly disease of extraterrestrial origin causes rapid and fatal clotting of the blood, threatening the entire human race. In Svalbard, the safest future seed warehouse in the world will be guarded by GMO Green Revolution police, the Rockefeller and Gates foundations, Syngenta, DuPont and CGIAR.
The Svalbard project will be managed by an organization called the World Trust for Plant Diversity (GCDT). Who are they to hold such considerable responsibility for the diversity of seeds around the world? GCDT was founded by FAO and Bioversity International (formerly International Plant Genetic Research Institute), an offshoot of CGIAR.
The GCDT is based in Rome. Its board is chaired by Margaret Catley-Carlson, a Canadian also on the advisory committee of the Suez Lyonnaise des Eaux group, one of the largest private water companies. Until 1998, Catley-Carlson was also chair of the New York-based Population Committee, John D. Rockefeller’s population reduction organization, created in 1952 to accelerate the Rockefeller family’s eugenics program, under covered to promote family planning, the system of birth control, sterilization and “population control” in developing countries.
Other members of the GCDT board include former executive of Bank of America, currently Hollywood DreamWorks Animation chief Lewis Coleman. Coleman is also a director of Northrup Grumman Corporation, one of the Pentagon’s largest contractors in the military industry.
The Brazilian Jorio Dauster is also president of the board of directors of Brasil Ecodiesel. He is a former Brazilian ambassador to the European Union, and the chief negotiator for Brazil’s external debt for the Ministry of Finance. Dauster also served as president of the Brazilian Coffee Institute and coordinator of the Brazilian Patent System Modernization Project, which involves legalizing patents on genetically modified seeds, something previously prohibited by law from Brazil.
Cary Fowler is Executive Director of GCDT. He was a professor and research director in the Department for International Environment and for Development Studies at the University of Life Sciences in Norway. Fowler was also the principal advisor to the managing director of Bioversity International. He represented the harvest centers of the future of the CGIAR in the negotiations for the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources. In the 1990s, he directed the FAO’s International Plant Genetic Resources Program. He drafted and supervised the negotiations of the FAO Global Plan of Action for Plant Genetic Resources adopted by 150 countries in 1996.
Dr Mangala Rai from India, member of the board of directors of the GCDT, is secretary of the Department of Agricultural Research and Education (DARE) of India, and director general of the Indian Council for Agricultural Research ( ICAR). He is also a member of the IRRI board of directors of the Rockefeller Foundation, which promoted “Golden Rice”, the first major experiment on GMOs carried out with much media hype and which turned out to be a fiasco. Rai has served as a member of the CIMMYT board of directors and as a member of the CGIAR executive board.
The Donor Trust for the Diversity of World Seeds or financial backers also includes “all the usual suspects”, as Humphrey Bogart says in the classic Casablanca. In addition to the Rockefeller and Gates foundations, donors include GMO giants, DuPont-Pioneer Hi-Bred, Syngenta from Basel in Switzerland, CGIAR and the energetic promoter of GMOs, USAID. Indeed, it seems that the foxes of GMOs and the reduction of populations keep the chicken coop of humanity and the diversity of world seeds in the store of Svalbard. (8)
WHY SVALBARD NOW?
One can legitimately wonder why Bill Gates, the Rockefeller Foundation, the main giants of agro-food genetic engineering like DuPont and Syngenta with the CGIAR, are building a Noah’s ark in the Arctic.
First of all, who uses this kind of seed vault? Breeders and researchers are the main users of these safes. Today, the most important breeders are Monsanto, DuPont, Syngenta and Dow Chemical, the global giants of patented GMO plants. Since early 2007, Monsanto, together with the United States government, has held global patent rights for so-called “Terminator” or GMO Restriction Technology. Terminator is an ominous technology that causes patented commercial seed to “commit suicide” after harvest. The control of private seed companies is total. Such control and control over the food chain has never existed before in human history.
This ingenious Terminator feature forces farmers to return each year to Monsanto or other GMO seed companies to get new seeds of rice, soy, corn, wheat or any other crop they need to feed the population. If it were widely adopted in the world, we could perhaps in ten years make the majority of the food producers of the world of new feudal serfs, enslaved to three or four seed giants like Monsanto, DuPont or Dow Chemical .
Of course, this would allow those who own these private companies, perhaps under Washington’s orders, to withhold seeds from certain developing countries, those whose policies would run counter to the interests of the United States government. Those who say “it couldn’t happen in this case” should take a closer look at current world events. The mere existence of this concentration of power in three or four giants deprived of the American food industry is in itself sufficient legal reason to prohibit any GMO culture – even if the gain in harvest was real, which is clearly not the case.
These private companies, Monsanto, DuPont, Dow Chemical, have little unblemished track record in terms of managing human life. They have developed and multiplied innovations such as dioxins, PCBs, Agent Orange. They have hidden for decades the clear evidence of the risks of cancer and other serious consequences for human health, linked to the use of toxic chemicals. They buried serious scientific reports on glyphosate. This substance, which is widely used in herbicides used all over the world, is toxic when it gets into drinking water (9). It is one of the basic ingredients of Monsanto’s Roundup, a herbicide linked to the purchase of most of this company’s genetically modified seeds. Denmark banned glyphosate in 2003, when it was confirmed that it was contaminating the country’s groundwater. (10)
The diversity of seeds stored in gene vaults is the raw material for plant reproduction and for many fundamental biological researches. Several hundred thousand samples are distributed each year for such purposes. The FAO lists some 1,400 seed vaults around the world, the largest being kept by the United States government. Other large vaults are owned by China, Russia, Japan, India, South Korea, Germany and Canada, in decreasing order of size. In addition, the CGIAR operates a chain of seed vaults in selected centers around the world.
The CGIAR, created in 1972 by the Rockefeller and Ford foundations to propagate their Green Revolution agro-food model, controls most of the private seed vaults, from the Philippines to Syria via Kenya. All of these current seed vaults contain over six and a half million seed varieties, nearly two million of which are “distinct”. Noah’s arch from Svalbard will have the capacity to house four and a half million different seeds.
GMOs AS A BIOLOGICAL WARFARE?
We now come to the heart of the matter, namely the dangerousness and potentially abusive use of the Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Foundation project in Svalbard. Could the development of patented seeds for most major food crops, such as rice, corn, wheat and for feed grains like soybeans, be used in a horrible form of biological warfare?
The explicit purpose of the eugenics lobby – funded since the 1920s by wealthy elite families, such as Rockefeller, Carnegie, Harriman and others – was to put into practice what they called “negative eugenics”, the systematic extermination of unwanted lines. In 1939, Margaret Sanger, alert eugenicist, founder of International Planning of Maternity and intimate of the Rockefeller family, led in Harlem an operation called “The Negro Project”. As she told a friend in a letter, “we want to exterminate the black people”. (11)
In 2001, Epicyte, a small California biotechnology company, announced the development of genetically modified corn containing a spermicide capable of sterilizing the men who ate it. Epicyte at that time had a joint venture agreement to disseminate its technology with DuPont and Syngenta, two of the sponsors of Noah’s ark plant in Svalbard. Since then, Epicyte has been acquired by a North Carolina biotechnology company. It was amazing to learn that Epicyte had developed its GM spermicidal corn with research funds from the United States Department of Agriculture, the same department which, despite opposition from around the world, continued to fund the development of Terminator technology, currently owned by Monsanto.
In the 1990s, WHO launched a so-called vaccination campaign against tetanus, a disease that can be contracted by walking, for millions of women between the ages of 15 and 45 from Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines. for example on a rusty nail. Men and boys were not vaccinated, although they are likely to be just as likely as women to walk on rusty nails.
Because of this curious anomaly, the Pro Vida de México Committee, a Roman Catholic secular organization, became suspicious and had a sample of the vaccine tested. Tests revealed that the tetanus vaccine being distributed by WHO to women of childbearing age contained chorionic gonadotropin or hCG, a natural hormone which, when combined with a tetanus toxoid, caused the activation of antibodies. which made the woman unable to maintain her pregnancy. It has been said that no woman was vaccinated.
Later it appeared that the Rockefeller Foundation with the Rockefeller Population Committee, the World Bank (which houses the CGIAR), and the National Institute of Health in the United States, were involved in a 20-year project , launched in 1972, to develop an abortive agent concealed in a tetanus vaccine for WHO. In addition, the government of Norway, the host of Svalbard’s Noah’s Ark, donated $ 41 million to develop a special tetanus vaccine with the capacity to cause abortion. (12)
Is it a coincidence that these same organizations, from Norway to the Rockefeller Foundation via the World Bank, are also involved in the seed vault project at Svalbard? According to Professor Francis Boyle, author of the law on anti-terrorism and biological weapons promulgated by the United States Congress in 1989, the Pentagon is “now prepared to compete and win biological war” within the framework of two directives of national strategy Bush laws adopted in 2002, “without the public knowing.” Boyle adds that, from 2001 to 2004, the US federal government spent $ 14.5 billion – a staggering amount – on work solely related to civil bioterrorism.
Richard Ebright, a biologist at Rutgers University, estimates that more than 300 scientific institutions and some 12,000 people in the United States today have access to pathogens suitable for biological warfare. The National Institute of Health of the US government is endowed with 497 grants solely for research on infectious diseases with potential for biological warfare. The justification, of course, is the defense against a possible terrorist attack, an excuse commonly used today.
The US government spends many dollars on genetic engineering related to biological warfare. According to Jonathan King, professor of biology at MIT, “the expanding bioterrorism programs represent the birth of a significant danger for our own population.” King adds: “although this kind of program is always called defensive, with biological weapons the defensive and offensive programs overlap almost completely”. (13)
The future will tell us, God forbid, if the vegetable Noah’s ark from Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Foundation at Svalbard is part of another Final Solution, that bringing about the final extinction of the Great Planet Earth.
Jenifer is not the first personality to fall into the trap and unfortunately it will probably not be the last.
May those who idolize it forgive us for this real duty of objectivity and urgently setting the record straight after all the inaccuracies it has distilled!
(Video at the end of this article)
In a video relayed by the very politically correct site that is MagicMaman, Jenifer demonstrated “brilliantly” his profound ignorance of the subject and of real emergencies in the poorest countries. Her naivety resembles that also demonstrated by Laetitia Halliday who was very proud to explain at 8pm TF1 to Claire Chazal that she was very happy to have helped to vaccinate children against tetanus …
The video begins by saying that “Jenifer is a mom committed to vaccination.” Some will wonder what about the possibility of financial compensation for such a commitment? Jenifer said “to have been touched as a mom, by this cause, by UNICEF”. But what did she really read as sources about the huge vaccine controversy? The rest of his answers will allow us to make some assumptions.
But let’s see what follows: Jenifer says she was ” touched by the numbers “, ” because you have to know that there are still a huge number of mothers and infants who die every year, even per minute. ”
And what about the figures for deaths from lack of water and food which are the bearers of a sad record, out of all proportion to tetanus?
As a reminder, a child dies of hunger every 6 seconds in the world , that is to say more than 5 MILLION annual deaths of children due to hunger. More than 920 million people are hungry in the world and 1 billion people are still deprived of drinking water! In this sad race for vaccination, unfortunately, each euro spent on vaccines is one euro that will not be invested in water and food, but this constitutes an undeniable health base, so much more logical and more urgent!
Especially since, as the scientist Masar already said in 1975 at the Dakar Conference: “After the First World War (in Czechoslovakia), the tetanus morbidity in the newborn was absolutely enormous. […] Without active immunization, morbidity was reduced to almost zero, simply by improving the care of the mother and the newborn child. “But it would be interesting to see what is the exact share of UNICEF funds that ultimately end up in water and food in proportion to the vaccines.
Jenifer continues. She hopes to” eradicate the disease “with this” great action “from UNICEF. Jenifer unfortunately does not know that tetanus is an impossible disease to eradicate because its reservoir is in the ground (in the ground).
this question “(hear the controversy over the merits of vaccination and therefore the distrust of a growing part of parents.) because for her” to vaccinate her child is to have the chance to prevent him from having a certain disease . ”
In any case,” she adds, ” I never asked myself the question. “before contradicting yourself and continuing” yes there are new vaccines, we are still cautious as a mom, if it is a vaccine that will not be harmful to your health etc. “.” Here we are talking about the tetanus vaccine so, of course, it must be done! “.
“I did not think that there were so many mothers who wondered whether it was good or not to have her child vaccinated, in fact. ”
” I wondered about the Varinox chickenpox vaccine. I ended up having my son vaccinated. ”
” It’s always stressful to get your child vaccinated, because we know the bite, the effect it has, even on some adults, but if I can avoid being sick … ”
” It You should know that by buying a pack of Pampers , it is a vaccine for the mom that will protect automaticallyher child if she is vaccinated, protect the child she is carrying and also vaccinate mothers likely to become pregnant to prevent their child from being born in poor health, because it is a relatively critical age the first 3 months of a newborn. ”
” Buy a pack of Pampers because it automatically saves a life. “Jenifer concludes misleadingly in this purely advertising video.
Some comments of course …
1 °) Jenifer says that she does not understand this question. It is certain that common sense cannot be learned, even on the benches of Star Ac ‘, we have it or we don’t have it.
There have always been gregarious and docile people who followed in principle what the authorities or the doctors said. These people also paid the price at all times. Whether with products touted in all the medical press and withdrawn from the market since, like Vioxx, or deleterious medical fashions which led at one time to consider Ignaz Semmelweis as crazy while this doctor insisted on the importance of wash hands to prevent death of women in childbirth (puerperal fever).
When you learn from officials that ” they don’t know how vaccines work ” (confession from Dr. Saluzzo de Sanofi Pasteur, also consultant for the WHO, in an online vaccinology course) or that they don’t ‘aluminum vaccines, used as an adjuvant, including for the tetanus vaccine, diffuses and acts in the body ( confession of Dr Nathalie Garçon, head of the Adjuvant Center at GSK ), we can only conclude that Jenifer has never heard of this information, otherwise she would obviously feel stupid for having said that she did not understand that parents could wonder about the merits of LESS vaccination !!
Is it reasonable to imagine, given this level of ignorance, that Jenifer could have known, if only through the media of the system, the content of the Jardé report in March 2012 and the request for a moratorium d ‘a group of deputies of the National Assembly on thesubstance notoriously toxic to the nervous system , especially that of children whose blood-brain barrier is even more permeable and we are not even talking about fetuses !!
Aluminum vaccine, it should be remembered, also ends up in the brain without ever being able to leave it. According to the Canadian neurologist at the University of British Columbia, Christopher Shaw, who has carried out various experiments on mice , vaccine aluminum is implicated in serious diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (approximately 1 million cases in France), Parkinson’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
Christopher Shaw who injected the same dose of aluminum vaccine into mice as that administered to humans in proportion to their weight, found a 41 X higher error rate in mice so poisoned and at autopsy, he found 35% destruction of motor neurons, i.e. nerve cells involved in movement.
No wonder then that these results gave goosebumps to his team, which obviously does not want to be vaccinated with such vaccines. As Shaw says, either these studies were never requested by the authorities, or they were well carried out but their results remain withheld from the public. He wonders what is most disturbing in both cases.
We could also add theremarkable work of Dr. Jean Pilette who has compiled more than 1,700 bibliographic references of publications attesting to the manifest dangers of vaccine aluminum. But does Jenifer only know what an adjuvant is? Let us doubt it!
2 °) Jenifer comes to ask questions only about the varicella vaccine which is still largely refused by a majority of parents, even by those who are in favor of all the other vaccines so much there, it is obvious for them that vaccination is absurd!
But unfortunately, too many people, not to say the vast majority, do not start asking questions until after a side effect or a case of vaccine failure (very common after this kind of chickenpox vaccine) . Besides that this vaccine has an immunosuppressive effect, that is to say that it lowers the immune system and makes it temporarily more fragile compared to various infections which can be very serious (it is also the case of the vaccine against tetanus, as several publications attest!), it changes the age of onset of the disease, depriving the child of a chance to benefit from a solid and lasting immunity for life and also increasing the risk of shingles at the individual and collective level. (Jenifer should also, in our opinion, find out about the exact name of the chickenpox vaccine, unless she recites an agreed lesson from UNICEF and has not remembered the name correctly? Varilrix or (Pro) Varivax …)
3 °) The discourse on “the bite” is soothing and very poorly masks the ignorance of the dangers of vaccines linked to their poor evaluation, to their ingredients, to the short-circuiting of the immune system etc.
Various studies and surveys have already shown that the health of unvaccinated children is MUCH BETTER than that of vaccinated children . To this corpus of data, it is also necessary to add the data which show that the mortality of well-nourished African baby girls who receive a DTP vaccine (diphtheria tetanus pertussis) is 3 times higher than that of African baby girls unvaccinated and even malnourished ( British Medical Journal study ) not including Miller et al. which shows that infant mortality is highest in the western countries that vaccinate the most.
4 °) To pretend that vaccinating will automatically protect against tetanus is a serious untruth in the light of the data acquired from Science!
Several publications have shown this: cases of tetanus, including deaths, have already occurred in vaccinated people who had more than a high level of antibodies (therefore well above the official threshold considered “protective”). “)! In 2000, Dr. Vinson wrote a letter to the British Medical Journal titled “Having been vaccinated against tetanus does not preclude the diagnosis of tetanus.” (a title that says it all if we compare it to Jenifer’s statements).
But more particularly concerning the cases of neonatal tetanus, let us also look at a very interesting communication made in 1991 in the journal FEMS Microbiology Immunology concerning 10 cases of neonatal tetanus in Dar Es-Salaam, in Tanzania. As a reminder, the vaccination of women (pregnant or not) is based on the principle that the antibodies they develop can pass through the placenta and supposedly protect the newborn absolutely …
Out of 10 cases studied , 9 had a protective antibody level , only the 10th was below the threshold (although his mother received a dose) while the 2nd (unvaccinated mother) had a level close to 4 times the protection threshold.In all other cases, the mothers had received, for all of their pregnancies, between 1 and 14 doses and had antitoxin levels from 7 to more than 400 times the protective level . The article ends: “The program to prevent neonatal tetanus should avoid hyperimmunization in women [because it may not be protective and cause frequent allergic reactions.].”
Finally, let us also underline what already happened in the early 90’s with tetanus vaccines which were only administered to women in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines … this vaccine contained “as if by chance” HCG hormone, a hormone necessary for successful pregnancy and which rises during this particular period of a woman’s life. By injecting these vaccines which contained this hormone, at the same time, women were made to produce antibodies against one of their natural hormones essential for carrying out a pregnancy and they were therefore made sterile at the same time. On the journalist Sylvie Simon’s site , an additional passage sheds light on the sad context of this episode:
“By mid-1993, WHO had spent a total of $ 365 million of its meager research funds on what is euphemistically called “reproductive health”, including the implantation of the hormone hCG in human vaccines. tetanus. WHO officials have refused to explain why the women who were vaccinated developed antibodies to hCG. They brushed aside the discoveries about the program by declaring that the accusations came from “anti-abortion and Catholic sources”, as if it had to imply some kind of bias. If you can’t deny the truth of the message, at least try to discredit the messenger. ”
But it is certain that Jenifer does not know this episode. It would have saved him from telling anything.
In addition, as mentioned above, scientific data shows that a vaccination against tetanus destabilizes and weakens the immune system for several weeks , leaving it more vulnerable to infections. However, it is quite obvious that the children of these countries who are often malnourished and lacking water are even more at risk of contracting a whole sampling of infectious diseases which can then only be statistically favored with this kind of blind vaccination.
5 °) Obviously, Jenifer did not learn at Stac Ac ‘what is misleading advertising (*) and how much it risks dragging such a step like a pan throughout his career.
The so-called “good intentions” have a good back, that convinces less and less people. Given the flow of information these days, it is becoming less and less acceptable to pretend to have wanted to do well for people who have such a hearing.
These speeches risk costing the lives of several children and generate costly side effects in their turn in these populations, already economically in very bad shape. Not to mention the ethical question surrounding the right of these poor populations to be able to benefit from free and fully informed consent in matters of vaccination. A right yet enshrined in laws on the rights of the patient in several Western countries but which are unfortunately never applied in the area of vaccination! But by the way, does Jenifer know what “free and informed consent” is in medical matters?
In short, it will be understood, beware of the smoky and manipulated speeches of the “people” and above all, let’s think of buying any other brand of swaddling clothes rather than Pampers, to avoid making us accomplices of these aberrations.
(*) Initiative Citoyenne contacts the (French) Advertising Ethics Jury about this advertisement due to its manifestly misleading nature, as this article has perfectly demonstrated.
Extremely bright extracts from an interview with Dr François Gasse, Out-of-Class Administrator of Immunization Projects, UNICEF , about tetanus vaccination programs in poor countries:
“The tetanus will still be there, so we can’t stop the vaccinations. Our goal is to make funding and routine immunization more reliable. […]
For tetanus, one of the main problems is to generate demand – to mobilize communities to be vaccinated. […]
We have learned to target those who decide. These are often religious leaders, husbands, or even the mother-in-law. You have to get their consent. This is especially crucial for maternal immunizations because they are women of childbearing age. However, communities are often suspicious and think that women will be sterilized. We must first convince a chef. For example, if he allows one of his unmarried daughters to be vaccinated, it can be very effective.[…]
We hope that pre-filled devices such as the UNIJECT will allow us to increase the number of vaccinators: it is a small plastic bubble fitted with a small needle. It is much easier to use than traditional injections and we can train students or others to vaccinate. The device cannot be used twice and this prevents the spread of disease due to reuse. It will also help us overcome resistance to vaccination due to fear of needles. Some women tell us, “Oh no! We cannot accept this vaccination for spiritual reasons. ”In reality, they are afraid of the injection. “
Are non-compliance and free-thinking a mental illness? According to the latest edition of DSM-IV (Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders)
yes. This manual identifies a new mental illness called “oppositional defiant disorder” or TOP. This disease is defined as a “continuous pattern of disobedience, hostility and provocation” and symptoms include questioning of authority, negativity, distrust, contradiction, and being easily annoyed.
The DSM-IV is the manual used by psychiatrists to diagnose mental illnesses, and with each new edition, there are dozens of these new illnesses. Are we getting more and more sick? Is it becoming more difficult to be mentally healthy? The DSM-IV authors state that this is because they are better able to identify these diseases today.
The new mental illnesses identified by DSM-IV include arrogance, narcissism, above-average creativity, cynicism, and anti-social behavior. What we used to call personality traits are now mental illnesses. And there are treatments.
Over the past 50 years, DSM-IV has grown from 130 to 357 of these diseases, and they continue to find more accurate cures for these diseases. The majority of these diseases strike children. Although this manual is an important diagnostic tool for the psychiatric industry, it has also been responsible for social change. The increase in TOP, bipolar disorder and depression in children has been largely due to the manual which identifies certain behaviors as symptoms. A Washington Post article noted that, if Mozart was born today, he would be diagnosed with a TOP and he would be medicated until he returned to normal.
According to the DSM-IV, adults can suffer from the same illnesses as children. This should give reason for concern to free thinkers. The Soviet Union used new mental illnesses for political repression. People who did not accept the Communist Party convictions developed a new form of schizophrenia. They suffered from the delirium of believing that communism was not a good thing. They were isolated, forcibly medicated, and underwent repressive therapy to bring them to their senses.
When the latest edition of DSM-IV was published, the identification of symptoms of various mental illnesses in children resulted in a significant increase in children’s medication. Some states even have laws that allow protection agencies to force treat, and have even made refusal to take medication punishable by fines or imprisonment. This gives a frightening image to all those who are non-conformists. Although the authors of this manual claim to have no ulterior motives, calling free thought and non-compliance a mental illness is a time bomb of all kinds. This can easily become a weapon in the arsenal of a repressive state.
Why are health scandals not accidents?
Why can’t it change?
Since he was elected UMP senator for Vaucluse in September 2004, Dr. Alain MILON has gradually taken over the levers of everything related to health care in the Senate.
– Member of the Parliamentary Office for the Evaluation of Health Policies,
– Vice-President of the Social Affairs Committee,
– Member of the High Council for the Financing of Social Protection,
– Vice-President of the Mission of ‘Social Security Assessment and Control (MECSS).
In addition, he chairs, or plays the role of rapporteur, in numerous committees concerning health, access to vaccines or reimbursement of medicines.
But strangely and jointly, we also find it intimately linked to players in the pharmaceutical industry:
– From October 24, 2005, he presides over the “First Social Meetings of the Senate – devoted to health”. At the round table he leads we find Ms. Véronique France-Tarif the lobbyist of Pfizer.
– On September 13, 2007, Alain Milon and Jean-Marie Le Guen organize and chair the “2nd Parliamentary Mental Health Meetings” funded by the pharmaceutical cartel Janssen-cilg, Pfizer and Sanofi-Aventis.
– On September 14, 2009, the doctors of the pharmaceutical industry (gathered within the AMIPS association) invite several personalities to a conference in order to ensure that they are not forgotten in the HPST bill (Hospital, Patients, Health, Territories). Alain Milon leads a round table again in the presence of Ms. Véronique France-Tarif, the lobbyist of Pfizer. This symposium is organized, within the Palais du Luxembourg, by the firm [AEC Partners chaired by François Sarkozy.
– On October 16, 2012, we find Alain Milon invited to a meeting on “Personalized medicine” organized by Pfizer and coordinated by the lobbying firm “Euro Politic”
In addition, Alain Milon is a member of the board of directors of the “Fondation Fondamental” (focused on scientific research on mental illnesses) chaired by David de Rothschild and funded by the Dassault Group and the pharmaceutical laboratories Astra-Zeneca, Bristol-Myers -Squibb, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, Lundbeck and Servier.
Given its key position in the field of health in the Senate and its strong links with the pharmaco-industrial complex, are we not entitled to ask the question “a little, a lot, passionately” of the conflict of interest?
In March 2010, after the scandal of the management of the H1N1 flu crisis by the UMP government of the time, the communist senator François Autain obtained the creation of a commission of inquiry on the role of the pharmaceutical companies in this affair . Although Autain was chairman of this commission, have you heard of sanctions against pharmaceutical companies? No ! It is normal, Dr. Milon had been appointed Rapporteur of this commission to empty it of any risk.
Another disturbing coincidence: since November 2012, Milon finds himself chairman of a senatorial commission of inquiry against the danger of sects in the health field.
Understand: “Senate commission of inquiry against the danger of alternative medicines for the pharmaceutical industry!”
As the questions posed by Mr Milon are entirely against the natural therapies and anti-vaccine movements, it is not difficult to guess that the measures to be proposed by this committee will be those of the pharmaco-industrial complex.
Doctor Éric Ancelet wrote, in 1998, a fascinating book on vaccines and medicine in general, which we warmly advise you to acquire. “To finish with Pasteur” dismantles, in 250 pages, more than a century of dogmas around vaccines and allopathic medicine, kept in place by religious, scientific, state and industrial leaders , thanks to ignorance and fear.
Illness is in most cases the symptom of a conflict, a warning that something is wrong in our life. Waging war on viruses, microbes and cancers is as absurd as the chemical warfare taking place in our agriculture, where the sinister concentration camps of intensive animal husbandry. At a time when propaganda is in full swing about a supposed swine flu, black plague of 2009, which the WHO and its industrial friends will try to eradicate with a shot, this book is of hot news.
“The few doctors who have remained faithful to tradition, who strive to give their patients the means to regain their health, encounter every day a colossal obstacle, almost insurmountable, heavy, rigid and thick, like all
dogmas: myth Pastorien of the bacterial origin of the diseases. “[…]
” This fundamental blunder, awe-inspiring by the universality of its total acceptance, locked for a century the patient education of the crowds in Health.
Now frozen in certainty materialistic, Medicine followed the easy path of the little minds, of those who see the enemy everywhere, kill him with an antibiotic weapon or cheat him by vaccine trickery. “[…]
“Parental, school and university education, like civic and medico-social information, taught us early to consider any microbe as potentially pathogenic and any disease as potentially
” which is pure, clean, prosperous, healthy, hygienic, which in addition smells good and which one can touch or ingest without risks, is by definition free from germs, in other words uncontaminated, perfectly aseptic. “[…]
“He or she or what, on the other hand, is doubtful, neglected, dirty,” poop “, soiled, unhealthy, smelly, repulsive, disgust is necessarily septic, teeming with microbes responsible for all the plagues and ready to jump in the nose who
approaches it. “[…]
“We must therefore react, keep clean, wash, scour, scald, poison, disinfect, pasteurize, sterilize, antibiotic therapy and of course vaccinate to prevent, avoid, reject, neutralize, destroy the Other, and correlatively
immunize, defend, isolate, guarantee, assure and secure, preserve, perpetuate, conserve, immortalize, mummify the Self. “[…]
” According to Rudolf Steiner, “modern materialism is born of fear.” And “beings who are afraid are to involuntary tyrants, fanatics of order, obsessed with the idea of having to educate, discipline the men and the things
around them, of having to keep control and overview at all times. “… ]
“It is fear which, far more than the microbe, is frighteningly contagious and pathogenic. If university medicine creates and maintains anxiety by constantly agitating the terrifying scarecrow of the disease, it is certainly
aberrant and sterile to content with shaking opposite that of vaccines, in a sordid balance of power to whom will terrorize the most. “[…]
” Unless information on the harmful effects of vaccinations is accompanied by an education likely to generate a real change of consciousness, a positive inner evolution that transcends fear, all
If you are someone who is well above 50 and is probably settling into the 60s or the 70s, you…
In one of the most remote places in the world, in Svalbard (near the Arctic Ocean), Bill Gates invests millions…
Jenifer is not the first personality to fall into the trap and unfortunately it will probably not be the last.…